Modern cloud providers offer secure alternatives to traditional bastion hosts and public SSH/RDP access. These solutions reduce the attack surface by eliminating the need to expose administrative ports directly to the Internet while still providing secure access to virtual machines and workloads.
| Feature | Azure Bastion | AWS SSM Session Manager | GCP Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Dedicated Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) proxy instance deployed within a dedicated subnet inside the Azure Virtual Network. | Platform API endpoints communicate with instances through the AWS Systems Manager Agent installed on the operating system. | Identity-aware proxy service built directly into Google's global network infrastructure. |
| Inbound Ports Required |
Port 443 (HTTPS) must be open on the Bastion service. Ports 22 (SSH) and 3389 (RDP) remain accessible only internally.
|
None. All inbound administrative ports can remain completely closed. |
Only Google's internal IAP address range
35.235.240.0/20
requires access.
|
| Access Methods |
|
|
|
| Primary Cost Model | Hourly infrastructure charges apply (except when using certain entry-level or developer-focused SKUs). | Free for standard EC2 administrative access through Session Manager. | Free for standard TCP forwarding and administrative access scenarios. |
High-Level Comparison
✓ Azure Bastion
- Provides browser-based SSH and RDP access.
- Requires a dedicated managed Bastion resource.
- Ideal for organizations heavily invested in Azure networking.
✓ AWS SSM Session Manager
- Requires no inbound SSH or RDP ports.
- Uses the AWS Systems Manager Agent.
- Often considered the most secure and operationally simple approach.
✓ Google Cloud IAP
- Integrates tightly with Google Identity and IAM.
- Provides secure TCP forwarding without exposing public endpoints.
- Well suited for zero-trust administrative access models.
⚠ Security Observation
AWS Session Manager and Google Cloud IAP allow administrators to keep SSH (
AWS Session Manager and Google Cloud IAP allow administrators to keep SSH (
22) and RDP (3389) ports completely closed to the Internet, significantly reducing the external attack surface compared to traditional bastion-host architectures.
Note
The solution that most closely aligns with a Zero-Trust architecture:
The solution that most closely aligns with a Zero-Trust architecture:
- AWS: SSM Session Manager
- Google Cloud: Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP)
- Azure: Azure Bastion (combined with Azure AD and Private Networking)
Azure VPN (Point-to-Site) vs Azure Bastion
Both Azure VPN (Point-to-Site) and Azure Bastion provide secure access to resources inside an Azure Virtual Network (VNet), but they are designed for very different use cases.
| Feature | Azure VPN (P2S) | Azure Bastion |
|---|---|---|
| How it Connects | Encrypted VPN tunnel from your local device directly into the Azure VNet. | Secure HTTPS-based RDP/SSH session delivered through the Azure Portal. |
| Access Scope | Full network-level access to VMs, databases, internal APIs, storage accounts, and other private resources within the VNet. | Access limited to a specific VM session via RDP or SSH. |
| Client Software | Requires the Azure VPN Client (or another supported VPN client). | No client installation required; operates directly through the Azure Portal. |
| Best Used For | Developers, administrators, and applications that require ongoing access to multiple private Azure resources. | Quick administrative tasks, troubleshooting, and secure VM management. |
Azure VPN (P2S):
Best when you need continuous access to an entire private network and its services.
Azure Bastion:
Best when you only need secure browser-based RDP/SSH access to virtual machines
without exposing management ports to the Internet.
Rule of Thumb:
Use Azure VPN when you need network access.
Use Azure Bastion when you only need secure VM access.
No comments:
Post a Comment